Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classificatio...
Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Excess recovery was alleged where the tax department adjusted refund amounts, including a 10% pre-deposit, towards disputed demand, resulting in collection beyond the 20% ceiling prescribed by administrative instructions. The court held that the taxpayer's representation seeking correction and refund required consideration on merits and directed the authority to decide the representation within six weeks; it further ordered that any amount recovered in excess of 20% of the disputed demand be refunded. - HC
Excess recovery was alleged where the tax department adjusted refund amounts, including a 10% pre-deposit, towards disputed demand, resulting in collection beyond the 20% ceiling prescribed by administrative instructions. The court held that the taxpayer's representation seeking correction and refund required consideration on merits and directed the authority to decide the representation within six weeks; it further ordered that any amount recovered in excess of 20% of the disputed demand be refunded. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
