Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether rectification under s.154 could sustain levy of tax at 60% under s.115BBE on alleged cash "on-money" from flat sales was examined in light of the appellate deletion of the underlying addition. Since the addition of the impugned sum had already been deleted by a coordinate bench in the quantum proceedings and there was no material showing that such deletion had been reversed or stayed, there was no subsisting income on which the enhanced rate could be applied through rectification. Accordingly, setting aside the s.154 rectification and allowing the taxpayer's appeal was upheld. - ITAT
Whether rectification under s.154 could sustain levy of tax at 60% under s.115BBE on alleged cash "on-money" from flat sales was examined in light of the appellate deletion of the underlying addition. Since the addition of the impugned sum had already been deleted by a coordinate bench in the quantum proceedings and there was no material showing that such deletion had been reversed or stayed, there was no subsisting income on which the enhanced rate could be applied through rectification. Accordingly, setting aside the s.154 rectification and allowing the taxpayer's appeal was upheld. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.