Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a limited scrutiny selected to examine s.14A expenditure and capital/share capital, the AO lacked jurisdiction to make an addition u/s 69; CBDT instructions u/s 119 are binding and breach vitiates the assessment, and later rectification u/s 154 cannot cure a jurisdictional defect, hence the assessment u/s 143(3) was quashed as void. On succession of a proprietary business to a company, once conditions of s.47(xiv) were satisfied, revaluation and higher issue price of shares did not negate the exemption, so no capital gains arose u/s 45. Consequently, the capital credit representing net business transfer could not be taxed u/s 68 and was deleted. Gifts received through registered settlement deeds from specified relatives were held genuine; valuation differences did not attract s.68 or s.56(2)(x), so the addition was deleted. - ITAT
In a limited scrutiny selected to examine s.14A expenditure and capital/share capital, the AO lacked jurisdiction to make an addition u/s 69; CBDT instructions u/s 119 are binding and breach vitiates the assessment, and later rectification u/s 154 cannot cure a jurisdictional defect, hence the assessment u/s 143(3) was quashed as void. On succession of a proprietary business to a company, once conditions of s.47(xiv) were satisfied, revaluation and higher issue price of shares did not negate the exemption, so no capital gains arose u/s 45. Consequently, the capital credit representing net business transfer could not be taxed u/s 68 and was deleted. Gifts received through registered settlement deeds from specified relatives were held genuine; valuation differences did not attract s.68 or s.56(2)(x), so the addition was deleted. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
