IBC resolution plan immunity from money-laundering: corporate debtor removed as accused; cases continue against ex-directors, attached assets refunded...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7441 to 7460 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was whether an intimation under s.143(1)(a), which made adjustments by disallowing deduction under s.35(1) and denying MAT credit, merged into the subsequent regular assessment under s.143(3), thereby foreclosing consideration of the assessee's rectification application under s.154. The Tribunal held that merger was not attracted because the AO, while completing the s.143(3) assessment, merely adopted the income as per the s.143(1)(a) intimation without adjudicating the assessee's specific grievances raised in the s.154 application. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority to decide the objections afresh, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether an intimation under s.143(1)(a), which made adjustments by disallowing deduction under s.35(1) and denying MAT credit, merged into the subsequent regular assessment under s.143(3), thereby foreclosing consideration of the assessee's rectification application under s.154. The Tribunal held that merger was not attracted because the AO, while completing the s.143(3) assessment, merely adopted the income as per the s.143(1)(a) intimation without adjudicating the assessee's specific grievances raised in the s.154 application. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority to decide the objections afresh, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
