Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Challenge to a seizure notice concerning import of perishable goods under a duty-free authorization turned on whether the notice was issued without authority of law and whether the goods were freely importable under the authorization. Given the perishability and the prima facie support from cited precedents, the Court balanced competing interests by directing the adjudicating authority to grant a personal hearing on a specified date, receive the importer's explanation and relied-upon authorities, and then pass a final order on whether any further action could be taken pursuant to the seizure notice within one week of receiving the explanation; the writ petition was disposed of with these directions. - HC
Challenge to a seizure notice concerning import of perishable goods under a duty-free authorization turned on whether the notice was issued without authority of law and whether the goods were freely importable under the authorization. Given the perishability and the prima facie support from cited precedents, the Court balanced competing interests by directing the adjudicating authority to grant a personal hearing on a specified date, receive the importer's explanation and relied-upon authorities, and then pass a final order on whether any further action could be taken pursuant to the seizure notice within one week of receiving the explanation; the writ petition was disposed of with these directions. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.