Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Unexplained cash deposits forming the basis of a provisional attachment were challenged as arbitrary and violative of natural justice. The appellant failed to provide a cogent, corroborated explanation for the cash kept at home and deposited in tranches, the need for multiple signatures on deposit slips, or the alleged contributions from relatives; the handwritten list lacked adequate identification details and the supporting affidavit was unsupported by source evidence. Given the mismatch between declared income and substantial cash deposits, the authority held that the origin and source of funds remained unproved, sustaining the finding that the attached assets were involved in money laundering, and dismissed the appeal. - AT
Unexplained cash deposits forming the basis of a provisional attachment were challenged as arbitrary and violative of natural justice. The appellant failed to provide a cogent, corroborated explanation for the cash kept at home and deposited in tranches, the need for multiple signatures on deposit slips, or the alleged contributions from relatives; the handwritten list lacked adequate identification details and the supporting affidavit was unsupported by source evidence. Given the mismatch between declared income and substantial cash deposits, the authority held that the origin and source of funds remained unproved, sustaining the finding that the attached assets were involved in money laundering, and dismissed the appeal. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.