Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal d...
Whether deduction under Section 10B could be disallowed by way of prima facie adjustment in an intimation under Section 143(1) was examined. Since the allowability of the deduction was a debatable issue requiring scrutiny of factual and legal records, it fell outside the permissible scope of Section 143(1); the disallowance was therefore quashed and the deduction restored. Separately, the impugned rectification order was held time-barred under Sections 154(6) and 154(7), rendering it null and void; consequential refund of adjusted amounts with applicable interest was directed within eight weeks. - HC
Whether deduction under Section 10B could be disallowed by way of prima facie adjustment in an intimation under Section 143(1) was examined. Since the allowability of the deduction was a debatable issue requiring scrutiny of factual and legal records, it fell outside the permissible scope of Section 143(1); the disallowance was therefore quashed and the deduction restored. Separately, the impugned rectification order was held time-barred under Sections 154(6) and 154(7), rendering it null and void; consequential refund of adjusted amounts with applicable interest was directed within eight weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
