Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Whether deduction under Section 10B could be disallowed by way of prima facie adjustment in an intimation under Section 143(1) was examined. Since the allowability of the deduction was a debatable issue requiring scrutiny of factual and legal records, it fell outside the permissible scope of Section 143(1); the disallowance was therefore quashed and the deduction restored. Separately, the impugned rectification order was held time-barred under Sections 154(6) and 154(7), rendering it null and void; consequential refund of adjusted amounts with applicable interest was directed within eight weeks. - HC
Whether deduction under Section 10B could be disallowed by way of prima facie adjustment in an intimation under Section 143(1) was examined. Since the allowability of the deduction was a debatable issue requiring scrutiny of factual and legal records, it fell outside the permissible scope of Section 143(1); the disallowance was therefore quashed and the deduction restored. Separately, the impugned rectification order was held time-barred under Sections 154(6) and 154(7), rendering it null and void; consequential refund of adjusted amounts with applicable interest was directed within eight weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
