Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Whether deduction under Section 10B could be disallowed by way of prima facie adjustment in an intimation under Section 143(1) was examined. Since the allowability of the deduction was a debatable issue requiring scrutiny of factual and legal records, it fell outside the permissible scope of Section 143(1); the disallowance was therefore quashed and the deduction restored. Separately, the impugned rectification order was held time-barred under Sections 154(6) and 154(7), rendering it null and void; consequential refund of adjusted amounts with applicable interest was directed within eight weeks. - HC
Whether deduction under Section 10B could be disallowed by way of prima facie adjustment in an intimation under Section 143(1) was examined. Since the allowability of the deduction was a debatable issue requiring scrutiny of factual and legal records, it fell outside the permissible scope of Section 143(1); the disallowance was therefore quashed and the deduction restored. Separately, the impugned rectification order was held time-barred under Sections 154(6) and 154(7), rendering it null and void; consequential refund of adjusted amounts with applicable interest was directed within eight weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
