Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment notices under Section 148 for AYs 2002-03 and 2005-06 were held time-barred as they were issued beyond two years from the end of the relevant assessment years; accordingly, the Revenue's challenge failed on limitation. For AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08, treating the assessee as a representative assessee/agent without issuing notice and passing an order under Section 163(2) was held to be non-compliance with a mandatory statutory condition; the breach could not be cured by relying on the assessee's conduct, rendering the assessments invalid and sustaining the Tribunal's view against the Revenue. - HC
Reassessment notices under Section 148 for AYs 2002-03 and 2005-06 were held time-barred as they were issued beyond two years from the end of the relevant assessment years; accordingly, the Revenue's challenge failed on limitation. For AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08, treating the assessee as a representative assessee/agent without issuing notice and passing an order under Section 163(2) was held to be non-compliance with a mandatory statutory condition; the breach could not be cured by relying on the assessee's conduct, rendering the assessments invalid and sustaining the Tribunal's view against the Revenue. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.