ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9361 to 9380 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Variable licence fee paid to the telecom regulator under the 1999 policy was held to be capital expenditure because it is consideration for acquiring/retaining the licence, and must be amortized under s.35ABB; the appellate relief treating it as revenue was reversed to that extent and the revenue's ground was partly allowed. Spectrum usage charges were distinguished as not covered by the SC ruling and, consistent with the assessment approach in another year, were treated as revenue expenditure deductible under s.37(1); the revenue's challenge on this aspect was dismissed. Subscriber verification penalty for KYC violations was held not hit by Explanation 1 to s.37(1) and remained allowable. Discounts on prepaid instruments were held outside s.194H, so disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was deleted, with consequential direction to recompute s.80-IA deduction. - ITAT
Variable licence fee paid to the telecom regulator under the 1999 policy was held to be capital expenditure because it is consideration for acquiring/retaining the licence, and must be amortized under s.35ABB; the appellate relief treating it as revenue was reversed to that extent and the revenue's ground was partly allowed. Spectrum usage charges were distinguished as not covered by the SC ruling and, consistent with the assessment approach in another year, were treated as revenue expenditure deductible under s.37(1); the revenue's challenge on this aspect was dismissed. Subscriber verification penalty for KYC violations was held not hit by Explanation 1 to s.37(1) and remained allowable. Discounts on prepaid instruments were held outside s.194H, so disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was deleted, with consequential direction to recompute s.80-IA deduction. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.