CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Revision under section 263 was examined regarding additions for allegedly unexplained purchases/sales and allied issues. Where the seller's sales had already been accepted/settled in first appeal, the same transactions could not be treated as unexplained in the purchaser's hands, and the revisional direction could not nullify the CIT(A)'s finding; section 263 jurisdiction was held improperly exercised to that extent. However, for purchases from another supplier whose sales were not shown to have been accepted and where the AO had made a bogus sales addition after PMGKY surrender, the AO's enquiry was held incomplete, justifying set-aside for de novo consideration. The unexplained difference between audited P&L profit and computed income also warranted de novo examination, and audit-objection-based initiation was upheld. Appeal partly allowed. - ITAT
Revision under section 263 was examined regarding additions for allegedly unexplained purchases/sales and allied issues. Where the seller's sales had already been accepted/settled in first appeal, the same transactions could not be treated as unexplained in the purchaser's hands, and the revisional direction could not nullify the CIT(A)'s finding; section 263 jurisdiction was held improperly exercised to that extent. However, for purchases from another supplier whose sales were not shown to have been accepted and where the AO had made a bogus sales addition after PMGKY surrender, the AO's enquiry was held incomplete, justifying set-aside for de novo consideration. The unexplained difference between audited P&L profit and computed income also warranted de novo examination, and audit-objection-based initiation was upheld. Appeal partly allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
