Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether accumulation under s.11(2) disclosed in Form 10 for construction at two schools could be treated as valid application when expenditure was also incurred on other schools run by the same charitable trust. The tribunal held that the trust's sole object was imparting education, and capital and revenue outgo on all schools run by it constituted application of income for charitable purposes; hence, the benefit of s.11(2) could not be denied merely because spending was not confined to the two named projects. However, since the AO noted discrepancies between claimed building expenditure and additions reflected in fixed asset records, allowance was made subject to verification, and the AO was directed to grant the claim upon such verification. - ITAT
Whether accumulation under s.11(2) disclosed in Form 10 for construction at two schools could be treated as valid application when expenditure was also incurred on other schools run by the same charitable trust. The tribunal held that the trust's sole object was imparting education, and capital and revenue outgo on all schools run by it constituted application of income for charitable purposes; hence, the benefit of s.11(2) could not be denied merely because spending was not confined to the two named projects. However, since the AO noted discrepancies between claimed building expenditure and additions reflected in fixed asset records, allowance was made subject to verification, and the AO was directed to grant the claim upon such verification. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
