Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Addition under s. 68 for unsecured loans was held unsustainable where the assessee furnished confirmations/affidavits, bank statements showing availability of funds, and banking-channel transfers, thereby establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness; the AO, despite having complete particulars, made no independent verification by issuing summons/notices under s. 133(6) and relied only on suspicion regarding low income or cash deposits, which could not substitute evidence, and the Finance Act, 2022 second proviso to s. 68 was held inapplicable to AY 2016-17; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of vouchers was restricted from 20% to 5% as reasonable. - ITAT
Addition under s. 68 for unsecured loans was held unsustainable where the assessee furnished confirmations/affidavits, bank statements showing availability of funds, and banking-channel transfers, thereby establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness; the AO, despite having complete particulars, made no independent verification by issuing summons/notices under s. 133(6) and relied only on suspicion regarding low income or cash deposits, which could not substitute evidence, and the Finance Act, 2022 second proviso to s. 68 was held inapplicable to AY 2016-17; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of vouchers was restricted from 20% to 5% as reasonable. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
