Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Addition under s. 68 for unsecured loans was held unsustainable where the assessee furnished confirmations/affidavits, bank statements showing availability of funds, and banking-channel transfers, thereby establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness; the AO, despite having complete particulars, made no independent verification by issuing summons/notices under s. 133(6) and relied only on suspicion regarding low income or cash deposits, which could not substitute evidence, and the Finance Act, 2022 second proviso to s. 68 was held inapplicable to AY 2016-17; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of vouchers was restricted from 20% to 5% as reasonable. - ITAT
Addition under s. 68 for unsecured loans was held unsustainable where the assessee furnished confirmations/affidavits, bank statements showing availability of funds, and banking-channel transfers, thereby establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness; the AO, despite having complete particulars, made no independent verification by issuing summons/notices under s. 133(6) and relied only on suspicion regarding low income or cash deposits, which could not substitute evidence, and the Finance Act, 2022 second proviso to s. 68 was held inapplicable to AY 2016-17; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of vouchers was restricted from 20% to 5% as reasonable. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
