Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clause (ii) of Condition No. 6 in the exemption notification, requiring exports to be backed by an irrevocable letter of credit opened before 25.08.2023, was held inapplicable where no letter of credit existed, since export through LoC is not statutorily mandatory and the condition presupposes an LoC-based transaction. Reading clauses (i) and (ii) conjunctively merely due to the word "and" was rejected; conditions must be construed contextually to avoid absurdity, and procedural requirements cannot defeat substantive entitlement where the notification's protective object is met. As the exporter satisfied clause (i) and realised export proceeds through recognised modes, exemption was granted and refund with interest was ordered within eight weeks - HC
Clause (ii) of Condition No. 6 in the exemption notification, requiring exports to be backed by an irrevocable letter of credit opened before 25.08.2023, was held inapplicable where no letter of credit existed, since export through LoC is not statutorily mandatory and the condition presupposes an LoC-based transaction. Reading clauses (i) and (ii) conjunctively merely due to the word "and" was rejected; conditions must be construed contextually to avoid absurdity, and procedural requirements cannot defeat substantive entitlement where the notification's protective object is met. As the exporter satisfied clause (i) and realised export proceeds through recognised modes, exemption was granted and refund with interest was ordered within eight weeks - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.