New 2025 Fourth Amendment tightens governance, executive roles and tech leadership for recognised stock exchanges, clearing corporations under 2018 Re...
Advance ruling on classification of roasted areca nuts was declined because the issue stood concluded by a binding HC decision and, under proviso (b) to section 281(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, the authority would not rule on a question already settled; consequently, no classification ruling was issued. On eligibility for preferential BCD exemption under Sr. No. 172 of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, the benefit was held conditional upon the importer proving, to the satisfaction of the proper officer, that the goods originate in the specified countries and that the applicable ASEAN-India origin rules and the 2020 CAROTAR requirements are complied with. - AAR
Advance ruling on classification of roasted areca nuts was declined because the issue stood concluded by a binding HC decision and, under proviso (b) to section 281(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, the authority would not rule on a question already settled; consequently, no classification ruling was issued. On eligibility for preferential BCD exemption under Sr. No. 172 of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, the benefit was held conditional upon the importer proving, to the satisfaction of the proper officer, that the goods originate in the specified countries and that the applicable ASEAN-India origin rules and the 2020 CAROTAR requirements are complied with. - AAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.