Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Challenge to the validity of the SCN on the ground that it was issued by an incompetent officer was rejected because, though the portal reflected the Superintendent, the SCN was actually signed by the competent Joint Director; consequently, the SCN was not invalidated. Objection to appellate forum/jurisdiction was rejected as the correct appellate authority was the Commissioner (Appeals), and the impugned DRC-07 was only a portal summary uploaded by the jurisdictional commissionerate based on the highest tax-demand principle in multi-notice adjudications; consequently, the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal, with a direction that an appeal filed by 31-01-2026 with pre-deposit shall not be dismissed as time-barred and must be decided on merits. - HC
Challenge to the validity of the SCN on the ground that it was issued by an incompetent officer was rejected because, though the portal reflected the Superintendent, the SCN was actually signed by the competent Joint Director; consequently, the SCN was not invalidated. Objection to appellate forum/jurisdiction was rejected as the correct appellate authority was the Commissioner (Appeals), and the impugned DRC-07 was only a portal summary uploaded by the jurisdictional commissionerate based on the highest tax-demand principle in multi-notice adjudications; consequently, the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal, with a direction that an appeal filed by 31-01-2026 with pre-deposit shall not be dismissed as time-barred and must be decided on merits. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
