Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
On repeal/omission of CGST Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) by Notification dated 08 October 2024, and in the absence of any saving clause or applicability of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, pending proceedings founded on the omitted provisions are not preserved; undisposed show cause notices, and orders (whether passed after 08 October 2024 or passed earlier but not yet final due to appeal/challenge and not "transactions past and closed") stand lapsed, leading to disposal of the petition. The revenue was left at liberty to initiate action on any other issue, with all contentions, including competence, kept open. - HC
On repeal/omission of CGST Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) by Notification dated 08 October 2024, and in the absence of any saving clause or applicability of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, pending proceedings founded on the omitted provisions are not preserved; undisposed show cause notices, and orders (whether passed after 08 October 2024 or passed earlier but not yet final due to appeal/challenge and not "transactions past and closed") stand lapsed, leading to disposal of the petition. The revenue was left at liberty to initiate action on any other issue, with all contentions, including competence, kept open. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
