Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
The dominant issue was whether the complainant in a prosecution instituted on a private complaint could be treated as a "victim" under Section 2(wa) Cr.P.C. so as to maintain an appeal against acquittal under the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. Relying on binding precedent, the Court held that such a complainant qualifies as a victim for this purpose; consequently, the leave-to-appeal application was to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 413 BNSS, 2023) and assigned to an appropriate appellate court for decision on merits expeditiously. -HC
The dominant issue was whether the complainant in a prosecution instituted on a private complaint could be treated as a "victim" under Section 2(wa) Cr.P.C. so as to maintain an appeal against acquittal under the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. Relying on binding precedent, the Court held that such a complainant qualifies as a victim for this purpose; consequently, the leave-to-appeal application was to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 413 BNSS, 2023) and assigned to an appropriate appellate court for decision on merits expeditiously. -HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
