Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7501 to 7520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty proceedings under s. 270A based on additions for delayed PF/ESI payments under s. 36(1)(va) were held vitiated for breach of natural justice, since no effective hearing was granted despite requests to keep the matter in abeyance pending appeal. The impugned penalty order was therefore quashed to the extent it related to those additions, and the matter was remitted for a fresh determination after affording a hearing, to be completed within 12 weeks. - HC
Penalty proceedings under s. 270A based on additions for delayed PF/ESI payments under s. 36(1)(va) were held vitiated for breach of natural justice, since no effective hearing was granted despite requests to keep the matter in abeyance pending appeal. The impugned penalty order was therefore quashed to the extent it related to those additions, and the matter was remitted for a fresh determination after affording a hearing, to be completed within 12 weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.