Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Whether dividend income of a trust was taxable by applying s.115BBDA depended on the scope of the Finance Act, 2016 amendments. The Tribunal held that the proviso to s.10(34) operates only in cases where s.115BBDA applies, and s.115BBDA expressly applies only to an individual, HUF, or firm, not to a trust. Consequently, the dividend remained exempt under s.10(34) in the hands of the trust, and the appellate authority's treatment of the dividend as taxable under s.115BBDA was contrary to law; the addition was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Whether dividend income of a trust was taxable by applying s.115BBDA depended on the scope of the Finance Act, 2016 amendments. The Tribunal held that the proviso to s.10(34) operates only in cases where s.115BBDA applies, and s.115BBDA expressly applies only to an individual, HUF, or firm, not to a trust. Consequently, the dividend remained exempt under s.10(34) in the hands of the trust, and the appellate authority's treatment of the dividend as taxable under s.115BBDA was contrary to law; the addition was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.