Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Whether dividend income of a trust was taxable by applying s.115BBDA depended on the scope of the Finance Act, 2016 amendments. The Tribunal held that the proviso to s.10(34) operates only in cases where s.115BBDA applies, and s.115BBDA expressly applies only to an individual, HUF, or firm, not to a trust. Consequently, the dividend remained exempt under s.10(34) in the hands of the trust, and the appellate authority's treatment of the dividend as taxable under s.115BBDA was contrary to law; the addition was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Whether dividend income of a trust was taxable by applying s.115BBDA depended on the scope of the Finance Act, 2016 amendments. The Tribunal held that the proviso to s.10(34) operates only in cases where s.115BBDA applies, and s.115BBDA expressly applies only to an individual, HUF, or firm, not to a trust. Consequently, the dividend remained exempt under s.10(34) in the hands of the trust, and the appellate authority's treatment of the dividend as taxable under s.115BBDA was contrary to law; the addition was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
