Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
Protective addition of the value of seized fine gold was impermissible once actual ownership was established. Since the owners of the seized gold were identified and had admitted ownership, and substantive assessment of the same asset was made in the hands of those real owners who undertook to discharge the tax liability, the assessee's mere status as a job worker could not justify a parallel protective addition. Accordingly, the protective addition in the assessee's hands was held invalid and was deleted, allowing the appeal. - ITAT
Protective addition of the value of seized fine gold was impermissible once actual ownership was established. Since the owners of the seized gold were identified and had admitted ownership, and substantive assessment of the same asset was made in the hands of those real owners who undertook to discharge the tax liability, the assessee's mere status as a job worker could not justify a parallel protective addition. Accordingly, the protective addition in the assessee's hands was held invalid and was deleted, allowing the appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
