Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9441 to 9460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refusal to convert shipping bills from drawback to DFIA was held unsustainable because an earlier appellate order had already directed conversion for all remaining shipping bills, causing the Commissioner's subsequent order allowing conversion for three years to merge with that appellate determination; the Revenue, having participated earlier, was barred from reopening the issue by res judicata. The restriction relied on under Circular No. 36/2010-Cus. was treated as inconsistent with s.149 of the Customs Act as held in prior judicial decisions, supporting validity of conversion. Consequently, conversion for the three-year period was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. -CESTAT
Refusal to convert shipping bills from drawback to DFIA was held unsustainable because an earlier appellate order had already directed conversion for all remaining shipping bills, causing the Commissioner's subsequent order allowing conversion for three years to merge with that appellate determination; the Revenue, having participated earlier, was barred from reopening the issue by res judicata. The restriction relied on under Circular No. 36/2010-Cus. was treated as inconsistent with s.149 of the Customs Act as held in prior judicial decisions, supporting validity of conversion. Consequently, conversion for the three-year period was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. -CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
