Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
HC held that the refund rejection communication issued under s.107(11) of the KGST & CGST Acts constituted a proper, appealable refund rejection order. The First Appellate Authority erred in summarily dismissing the appeal as not maintainable on the incorrect premise that no refund rejection order existed and without recording any findings on merits or considering the relevant statutory provisions. HC set aside the impugned appellate order and remanded the matter to the First Appellate Authority for fresh consideration on merits in accordance with law, thereby allowing the petition by way of remand.
HC held that the refund rejection communication issued under s.107(11) of the KGST & CGST Acts constituted a proper, appealable refund rejection order. The First Appellate Authority erred in summarily dismissing the appeal as not maintainable on the incorrect premise that no refund rejection order existed and without recording any findings on merits or considering the relevant statutory provisions. HC set aside the impugned appellate order and remanded the matter to the First Appellate Authority for fresh consideration on merits in accordance with law, thereby allowing the petition by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
