Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7501 to 7520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the transfer pricing order u/s 92CA(3) was passed beyond the statutory period of 60 days prior to the limitation date for completing the assessment. Calculating the 60-day backward period, the Tribunal concluded that the last permissible date for passing the TP order was 29.01.2015, whereas the order was actually passed on 30.01.2015. Following binding HC precedent on identical limitation computation, the ITAT declared the TP order time barred, quashed it, and consequently deleted the entire TP adjustment, allowing the assessee's appeal.
The ITAT held that the transfer pricing order u/s 92CA(3) was passed beyond the statutory period of 60 days prior to the limitation date for completing the assessment. Calculating the 60-day backward period, the Tribunal concluded that the last permissible date for passing the TP order was 29.01.2015, whereas the order was actually passed on 30.01.2015. Following binding HC precedent on identical limitation computation, the ITAT declared the TP order time barred, quashed it, and consequently deleted the entire TP adjustment, allowing the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
