Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
HC quashed the impugned orders concerning misclassification of tax paid under SGST and CGST instead of IGST. It directed the tax authorities to reconsider the matter afresh by duly appropriating the amounts already deposited under SGST and CGST towards the IGST liability. The Court further mandated that, upon such reconsideration, any excess payment or refund legitimately due to the petitioner shall be processed and disbursed forthwith in accordance with Section 77 of the GST Act. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of with these directions.
HC quashed the impugned orders concerning misclassification of tax paid under SGST and CGST instead of IGST. It directed the tax authorities to reconsider the matter afresh by duly appropriating the amounts already deposited under SGST and CGST towards the IGST liability. The Court further mandated that, upon such reconsideration, any excess payment or refund legitimately due to the petitioner shall be processed and disbursed forthwith in accordance with Section 77 of the GST Act. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of with these directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
