Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
AAR held that the proposed imports, Air Start Unit (ASU) GS-400 and Air Conditioning Unit (ACU) GF-50, are classifiable as aircraft parts under CTH 8807 30 10. Applying Section XVII Note 3, AAR found both units are engineered solely and principally for aircraft operation, have exclusive aircraft couplings/parameters, and lack any plausible general-purpose use, thus not being "parts of general use" excluded by Note 2. Relying on the SC ruling in Commissioner v. Mak Controls and subsequent CESTAT application, AAR concluded that such ground-based units functioning as APU-off substitutes form integral parts of aircraft systems and must be classified under heading 8807 30 10.
AAR held that the proposed imports, Air Start Unit (ASU) GS-400 and Air Conditioning Unit (ACU) GF-50, are classifiable as aircraft parts under CTH 8807 30 10. Applying Section XVII Note 3, AAR found both units are engineered solely and principally for aircraft operation, have exclusive aircraft couplings/parameters, and lack any plausible general-purpose use, thus not being "parts of general use" excluded by Note 2. Relying on the SC ruling in Commissioner v. Mak Controls and subsequent CESTAT application, AAR concluded that such ground-based units functioning as APU-off substitutes form integral parts of aircraft systems and must be classified under heading 8807 30 10.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
