Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
NCLAT permitted correction of the nomenclature of the pending application from "Review" to "Recall," noting that the body already treated it as a recall application, and found no necessity to restrain NCLT from proceeding with the creditor's Section 7 IBC application. On the substantive prayer to recall and set aside NCLAT's earlier order (and thereby restore NCLT's dismissal of the Section 7 application), NCLAT held that the applicant was impermissibly seeking a re-appreciation of its judgment in the guise of recall, particularly after having approached the SC and not pressing the appeal. The recall application was dismissed.
NCLAT permitted correction of the nomenclature of the pending application from "Review" to "Recall," noting that the body already treated it as a recall application, and found no necessity to restrain NCLT from proceeding with the creditor's Section 7 IBC application. On the substantive prayer to recall and set aside NCLAT's earlier order (and thereby restore NCLT's dismissal of the Section 7 application), NCLAT held that the applicant was impermissibly seeking a re-appreciation of its judgment in the guise of recall, particularly after having approached the SC and not pressing the appeal. The recall application was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
