Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the admission of a Section 7 IBC application against the corporate debtor. It rejected the respondent's objection to locus, holding that the appellant, being a shareholder and personal guarantor for the very facilities forming the basis of the Section 7 claim, was competent to maintain the appeal. On merits, NCLAT found undisputed financial facilities, their valid assignment, a subsequent OTS proposal, authenticated default in NeSL records, and acknowledgment in the balance sheet, justifying admission of the Section 7 petition. The Tribunal clarified that jurisdiction under Section 65 IBC may be exercised by the adjudicating authority at any stage and granted liberty to the appellant to move such an application. The appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the admission of a Section 7 IBC application against the corporate debtor. It rejected the respondent's objection to locus, holding that the appellant, being a shareholder and personal guarantor for the very facilities forming the basis of the Section 7 claim, was competent to maintain the appeal. On merits, NCLAT found undisputed financial facilities, their valid assignment, a subsequent OTS proposal, authenticated default in NeSL records, and acknowledgment in the balance sheet, justifying admission of the Section 7 petition. The Tribunal clarified that jurisdiction under Section 65 IBC may be exercised by the adjudicating authority at any stage and granted liberty to the appellant to move such an application. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.