Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
NCLAT upheld the admission of a Section 7 IBC application against the corporate debtor. It rejected the respondent's objection to locus, holding that the appellant, being a shareholder and personal guarantor for the very facilities forming the basis of the Section 7 claim, was competent to maintain the appeal. On merits, NCLAT found undisputed financial facilities, their valid assignment, a subsequent OTS proposal, authenticated default in NeSL records, and acknowledgment in the balance sheet, justifying admission of the Section 7 petition. The Tribunal clarified that jurisdiction under Section 65 IBC may be exercised by the adjudicating authority at any stage and granted liberty to the appellant to move such an application. The appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the admission of a Section 7 IBC application against the corporate debtor. It rejected the respondent's objection to locus, holding that the appellant, being a shareholder and personal guarantor for the very facilities forming the basis of the Section 7 claim, was competent to maintain the appeal. On merits, NCLAT found undisputed financial facilities, their valid assignment, a subsequent OTS proposal, authenticated default in NeSL records, and acknowledgment in the balance sheet, justifying admission of the Section 7 petition. The Tribunal clarified that jurisdiction under Section 65 IBC may be exercised by the adjudicating authority at any stage and granted liberty to the appellant to move such an application. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
