Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
HC, dealing with allegations of fraudulent availment of ITC, declined to exercise writ jurisdiction in view of the efficacious alternate statutory remedy under the GST appellate mechanism. Relying on the principle that complex factual disputes and voluminous evidence must be examined by the appellate authority, HC relegated the Petitioner to appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. Considering the plea of absence of personal hearing and delayed uploading of SCN as issues warranting appellate scrutiny, HC directed that, if appeal with requisite pre-deposit is filed by 15 January 2026, it shall not be rejected on limitation and must be decided on merits. Petition disposed.
HC, dealing with allegations of fraudulent availment of ITC, declined to exercise writ jurisdiction in view of the efficacious alternate statutory remedy under the GST appellate mechanism. Relying on the principle that complex factual disputes and voluminous evidence must be examined by the appellate authority, HC relegated the Petitioner to appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. Considering the plea of absence of personal hearing and delayed uploading of SCN as issues warranting appellate scrutiny, HC directed that, if appeal with requisite pre-deposit is filed by 15 January 2026, it shall not be rejected on limitation and must be decided on merits. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
