Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
HC, dealing with allegations of fraudulent availment of ITC, declined to exercise writ jurisdiction in view of the efficacious alternate statutory remedy under the GST appellate mechanism. Relying on the principle that complex factual disputes and voluminous evidence must be examined by the appellate authority, HC relegated the Petitioner to appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. Considering the plea of absence of personal hearing and delayed uploading of SCN as issues warranting appellate scrutiny, HC directed that, if appeal with requisite pre-deposit is filed by 15 January 2026, it shall not be rejected on limitation and must be decided on merits. Petition disposed.
HC, dealing with allegations of fraudulent availment of ITC, declined to exercise writ jurisdiction in view of the efficacious alternate statutory remedy under the GST appellate mechanism. Relying on the principle that complex factual disputes and voluminous evidence must be examined by the appellate authority, HC relegated the Petitioner to appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. Considering the plea of absence of personal hearing and delayed uploading of SCN as issues warranting appellate scrutiny, HC directed that, if appeal with requisite pre-deposit is filed by 15 January 2026, it shall not be rejected on limitation and must be decided on merits. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
