Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7281 to 7300 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the restriction under s.112A(6) on claiming rebate u/s 87A applies only to Long-Term Equity Capital Gains covered by s.112A(1)(ii), and not to Long-Term Debt Capital Gains, which are governed by s.112. As the assessee's tax on debt LTCG and on other normal income each exceeded the rebate threshold of Rs. 25,000, the assessee was held entitled to the full rebate of Rs. 25,000 u/s 87A. CPC was directed to recompute the tax liability accordingly in line with this interpretation.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the restriction under s.112A(6) on claiming rebate u/s 87A applies only to Long-Term Equity Capital Gains covered by s.112A(1)(ii), and not to Long-Term Debt Capital Gains, which are governed by s.112. As the assessee's tax on debt LTCG and on other normal income each exceeded the rebate threshold of Rs. 25,000, the assessee was held entitled to the full rebate of Rs. 25,000 u/s 87A. CPC was directed to recompute the tax liability accordingly in line with this interpretation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.