Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision u/s 263 for AY 2020-21, holding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue due to non-examination of depreciation claimed on goodwill. The assessee's contention that the tax audit report sufficed and that no further enquiry by AO was needed was rejected. ITAT confined the validity of revision to the year under consideration and held that PCIT's observations regarding earlier years would not bind the set-aside proceedings, though they may guide Revenue separately. The direction to AO to verify the depreciation claim on goodwill was sustained. The objection regarding absence of DIN in the s.263 notice was also rejected.
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision u/s 263 for AY 2020-21, holding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue due to non-examination of depreciation claimed on goodwill. The assessee's contention that the tax audit report sufficed and that no further enquiry by AO was needed was rejected. ITAT confined the validity of revision to the year under consideration and held that PCIT's observations regarding earlier years would not bind the set-aside proceedings, though they may guide Revenue separately. The direction to AO to verify the depreciation claim on goodwill was sustained. The objection regarding absence of DIN in the s.263 notice was also rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.