Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's claim for deduction u/s 10B despite absence of separate books for eligible units, following earlier coordinate bench orders affirmed by Delhi HC, and dismissed Revenue's grounds. In TP, ITAT directed exclusion of specified comparables (Apitco, Cameo Corporate Services, Global Procurement Consultants, Killick Agencies and Marketing, Orient Engineering and Commercial) as functionally dissimilar for the corporate support services segment. ITAT further held, consistent with prior years and Delhi HC/ITAT precedents, that no addition u/s 14A read with Rule 8D is permissible while computing book profits u/s 115JB, and deleted the disallowance u/s 14A for lack of AO's recorded satisfaction. ITAT also permitted enhanced deduction u/s 10B based on suo motu disallowance, holding Goetze (India) inapplicable to appellate powers.
ITAT allowed assessee's claim for deduction u/s 10B despite absence of separate books for eligible units, following earlier coordinate bench orders affirmed by Delhi HC, and dismissed Revenue's grounds. In TP, ITAT directed exclusion of specified comparables (Apitco, Cameo Corporate Services, Global Procurement Consultants, Killick Agencies and Marketing, Orient Engineering and Commercial) as functionally dissimilar for the corporate support services segment. ITAT further held, consistent with prior years and Delhi HC/ITAT precedents, that no addition u/s 14A read with Rule 8D is permissible while computing book profits u/s 115JB, and deleted the disallowance u/s 14A for lack of AO's recorded satisfaction. ITAT also permitted enhanced deduction u/s 10B based on suo motu disallowance, holding Goetze (India) inapplicable to appellate powers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
