Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that notifications under Ss. 3 and 5 FTDR Act cannot operate retrospectively and the Central Government lacks statutory authority to confer retrospective effect on the Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) Scheme. The notification dated 09.09.2021 was held to be purely prospective and inapplicable to exports made between 01.04.2021 and 08.09.2021. Chilli exporters who effected exports between 09.09.2021 and 24.03.2022 are entitled to claim incentives under the TMA Scheme, subject to fulfilling eligibility criteria, notwithstanding the foreclosure notification dated 25.03.2022. The writ petition was partly allowed, directing respondents to process incentive claims only for exports made during 09.09.2021 to 24.03.2022 and denying any vested right for the earlier period.
HC held that notifications under Ss. 3 and 5 FTDR Act cannot operate retrospectively and the Central Government lacks statutory authority to confer retrospective effect on the Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) Scheme. The notification dated 09.09.2021 was held to be purely prospective and inapplicable to exports made between 01.04.2021 and 08.09.2021. Chilli exporters who effected exports between 09.09.2021 and 24.03.2022 are entitled to claim incentives under the TMA Scheme, subject to fulfilling eligibility criteria, notwithstanding the foreclosure notification dated 25.03.2022. The writ petition was partly allowed, directing respondents to process incentive claims only for exports made during 09.09.2021 to 24.03.2022 and denying any vested right for the earlier period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.