Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
HC, in revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC, set aside the trial court's order refusing rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. It held that the suit, challenging alleged forged and ante-dated shareholders' agreements, board resolutions and share transfer documents, is barred by Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, as the core issues are already agitated in a pending company petition before NCLT, which is competent to examine allegations of forgery and fraud integral to company affairs. To avoid multiplicity and conflicting findings, the plaint was rejected as not maintainable; other objections were left open.
HC, in revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC, set aside the trial court's order refusing rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. It held that the suit, challenging alleged forged and ante-dated shareholders' agreements, board resolutions and share transfer documents, is barred by Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, as the core issues are already agitated in a pending company petition before NCLT, which is competent to examine allegations of forgery and fraud integral to company affairs. To avoid multiplicity and conflicting findings, the plaint was rejected as not maintainable; other objections were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
