Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC considered petitions for bail in an alleged CGST-related economic offence involving creation of fictitious firms, fake invoices and wrongful availment/passing of input tax credit of approximately Rs.160.58 crores. Noting that the evidence is largely documentary/electronic, that the petitioners have been in custody since 05.03.2025, and that trial is likely to be protracted, HC held that continued incarceration would infringe their Article 21 rights, including the right to speedy trial. Relying on the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, even in economic offences, HC granted bail to the petitioners, subject to bail/surety bonds and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court/Duty Magistrate.
HC considered petitions for bail in an alleged CGST-related economic offence involving creation of fictitious firms, fake invoices and wrongful availment/passing of input tax credit of approximately Rs.160.58 crores. Noting that the evidence is largely documentary/electronic, that the petitioners have been in custody since 05.03.2025, and that trial is likely to be protracted, HC held that continued incarceration would infringe their Article 21 rights, including the right to speedy trial. Relying on the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, even in economic offences, HC granted bail to the petitioners, subject to bail/surety bonds and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court/Duty Magistrate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
