Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the assessee, a co-operative society registered under the Sikkim Co-operative Societies Act, is not a "co-operative bank" within the exclusionary ambit of s.80P(4) of the Income-tax Act and was wrongly denied deduction by the Tribunal. Interest income arose from surplus funds and statutory reserves invested, as mandated by the Sikkim Co-operative Societies Act, in approved co-operative banks which themselves are registered as co-operative societies. Applying the ratio of PCIT v. Ashwin Kumar Urban Co-operative Society Ltd. and distinguishing Totgars' Cooperative Sale Society Ltd., HC ruled that deduction is allowable under s.80P(2)(d). Appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.
HC held that the assessee, a co-operative society registered under the Sikkim Co-operative Societies Act, is not a "co-operative bank" within the exclusionary ambit of s.80P(4) of the Income-tax Act and was wrongly denied deduction by the Tribunal. Interest income arose from surplus funds and statutory reserves invested, as mandated by the Sikkim Co-operative Societies Act, in approved co-operative banks which themselves are registered as co-operative societies. Applying the ratio of PCIT v. Ashwin Kumar Urban Co-operative Society Ltd. and distinguishing Totgars' Cooperative Sale Society Ltd., HC ruled that deduction is allowable under s.80P(2)(d). Appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.