Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of condonation of delay in filing ITR for AY 2018-19. It held that a 30-month delay could not be excused under the "genuine hardship" proviso merely on the generic plea of disputes between directors and financial difficulty, particularly when the company remained a going concern and had duly filed ITRs for AYs 2017-18 and 2019-20. The Court found no documentary proof of the alleged director dispute and concluded that statutory obligations cannot be deferred on such assertions. Relying on precedent, the HC held that liberal construction of "genuine hardship" cannot extend to condoning such inordinate, unjustified delay.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of condonation of delay in filing ITR for AY 2018-19. It held that a 30-month delay could not be excused under the "genuine hardship" proviso merely on the generic plea of disputes between directors and financial difficulty, particularly when the company remained a going concern and had duly filed ITRs for AYs 2017-18 and 2019-20. The Court found no documentary proof of the alleged director dispute and concluded that statutory obligations cannot be deferred on such assertions. Relying on precedent, the HC held that liberal construction of "genuine hardship" cannot extend to condoning such inordinate, unjustified delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.