Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding the reassessment proceedings invalid. It found that, pursuant to the CBDT Notification dated 29.03.2022 framing the E-Assessment of Income Assessment Scheme, 2022, issuance of notice under s.148 must be through automated allocation and in a faceless manner by the designated faceless authority, not by the jurisdictional assessing officer. As the impugned notice under s.148, dated 28.03.2024, was issued by the local JAO and not by NFAC, it was held contrary to the Scheme and ultra vires. Consequently, the s.147 proceedings and ensuing assessment stood vitiated and were quashed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding the reassessment proceedings invalid. It found that, pursuant to the CBDT Notification dated 29.03.2022 framing the E-Assessment of Income Assessment Scheme, 2022, issuance of notice under s.148 must be through automated allocation and in a faceless manner by the designated faceless authority, not by the jurisdictional assessing officer. As the impugned notice under s.148, dated 28.03.2024, was issued by the local JAO and not by NFAC, it was held contrary to the Scheme and ultra vires. Consequently, the s.147 proceedings and ensuing assessment stood vitiated and were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
