Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction u/s 10A prior to setting off brought forward unabsorbed depreciation and business losses. Relying on the SC ruling in CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd, the Tribunal reiterated that although s.10A is a deduction provision, the deduction is to be allowed at the stage of computing the gross total income of the eligible undertaking under Chapter IV, not at the stage of computing total income under Chapter VI. Consequently, the AO's adjustment was held unsustainable and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction u/s 10A prior to setting off brought forward unabsorbed depreciation and business losses. Relying on the SC ruling in CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd, the Tribunal reiterated that although s.10A is a deduction provision, the deduction is to be allowed at the stage of computing the gross total income of the eligible undertaking under Chapter IV, not at the stage of computing total income under Chapter VI. Consequently, the AO's adjustment was held unsustainable and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.