Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by the auction-purchaser, holding that recovery of pre-liquidation dues such as excise and customs duties from the purchaser of the company's assets is impermissible. It held that, in a liquidation sale conducted under the Companies Act, 1956, only sales tax is payable by the purchaser and all other pre-liquidation statutory dues stand settled in accordance with that Act, with no surviving claim against the auction-purchaser. In the absence of any overriding non-obstante clause in the relevant fiscal statutes, the department cannot bypass the official liquidator. The demand notices issued to the appellant-auction-purchaser were, therefore, held to be without jurisdiction and set aside.
CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by the auction-purchaser, holding that recovery of pre-liquidation dues such as excise and customs duties from the purchaser of the company's assets is impermissible. It held that, in a liquidation sale conducted under the Companies Act, 1956, only sales tax is payable by the purchaser and all other pre-liquidation statutory dues stand settled in accordance with that Act, with no surviving claim against the auction-purchaser. In the absence of any overriding non-obstante clause in the relevant fiscal statutes, the department cannot bypass the official liquidator. The demand notices issued to the appellant-auction-purchaser were, therefore, held to be without jurisdiction and set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.