Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7361 to 7380 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that the diagnostic kits imported by the applicant are laboratory reagents in kit form and are correctly classifiable under Tariff Item 38221990 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, by application of Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation. The goods are not "certified reference materials" as no data on degree of certainty is provided. The proposed reclassification is accepted but will operate only prospectively. On exemption, AAR held the kits are not eligible for Basic Customs Duty exemption under the relevant customs notifications, as the presence of Bovine Serum Albumin as one ingredient does not satisfy the specific exemption meant for Bovine Albumin in isolated form.
AAR held that the diagnostic kits imported by the applicant are laboratory reagents in kit form and are correctly classifiable under Tariff Item 38221990 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, by application of Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation. The goods are not "certified reference materials" as no data on degree of certainty is provided. The proposed reclassification is accepted but will operate only prospectively. On exemption, AAR held the kits are not eligible for Basic Customs Duty exemption under the relevant customs notifications, as the presence of Bovine Serum Albumin as one ingredient does not satisfy the specific exemption meant for Bovine Albumin in isolated form.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.