Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC upheld NCLAT's dismissal of the purchaser's appeals concerning sale of the corporate debtor's Raichur assets. It held that, after failure of the auction process and a subsequent decision for scrap sale, the transaction with the purchaser was a private sale requiring NCLT approval and did not fall under Regulation 33(2)(c) of the Liquidation Regulations. The forfeiture of Rs.37.80 crores was sustained as a consequence of non-compliance with the extended payment timelines imposed by NCLT, which the purchaser had accepted and partially acted upon. SC also found abuse of process in the purchaser's parallel writ before HC, further disentitling it to any equitable relief.
SC upheld NCLAT's dismissal of the purchaser's appeals concerning sale of the corporate debtor's Raichur assets. It held that, after failure of the auction process and a subsequent decision for scrap sale, the transaction with the purchaser was a private sale requiring NCLT approval and did not fall under Regulation 33(2)(c) of the Liquidation Regulations. The forfeiture of Rs.37.80 crores was sustained as a consequence of non-compliance with the extended payment timelines imposed by NCLT, which the purchaser had accepted and partially acted upon. SC also found abuse of process in the purchaser's parallel writ before HC, further disentitling it to any equitable relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
