Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT, in appeal by the Operational Creditor, upheld dismissal of a S.9 IBC application on the ground that the statutory threshold under S.4 IBC was not satisfactorily established. The Tribunal noted that the revised computation of debt and interest, allegedly excluding invoices covered by the S.10A bar, was opaque and not invoice-wise correlated. The interest was calculated on a straight-line basis without specifying periods per invoice, and it was unclear whether invoices raised during the S.10A period were segregated and excluded. Given the lack of clarity in the 21.05.2024 invoice, the Adjudicating Authority's conclusion that the threshold requirement was not met was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT, in appeal by the Operational Creditor, upheld dismissal of a S.9 IBC application on the ground that the statutory threshold under S.4 IBC was not satisfactorily established. The Tribunal noted that the revised computation of debt and interest, allegedly excluding invoices covered by the S.10A bar, was opaque and not invoice-wise correlated. The interest was calculated on a straight-line basis without specifying periods per invoice, and it was unclear whether invoices raised during the S.10A period were segregated and excluded. Given the lack of clarity in the 21.05.2024 invoice, the Adjudicating Authority's conclusion that the threshold requirement was not met was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
