Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7361 to 7380 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that services received by the appellant from overseas entities are classifiable as IPR services and not as franchise services. Applying its earlier decision in the appellant's own case, the Tribunal ruled that the appellant is entitled to the exemption/abatement of service tax under the Notification dated 10.09.2004 available to holders of IPR. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's request to keep the matter pending merely because the earlier order had been admitted in appeal by SC, noting absence of any stay and distinguishing the West Coast Paper Mills ruling. The appeal was accordingly allowed in favour of the appellant.
CESTAT held that services received by the appellant from overseas entities are classifiable as IPR services and not as franchise services. Applying its earlier decision in the appellant's own case, the Tribunal ruled that the appellant is entitled to the exemption/abatement of service tax under the Notification dated 10.09.2004 available to holders of IPR. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's request to keep the matter pending merely because the earlier order had been admitted in appeal by SC, noting absence of any stay and distinguishing the West Coast Paper Mills ruling. The appeal was accordingly allowed in favour of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
