Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
HC upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(aa) of the CGST Act and corresponding State provision, holding that stricter conditions for availing ITC, linked to the supplier's GST compliance, are a legitimate measure to curb fraudulent claims and enhance transparency. However, the provision was read down to protect bona fide recipients: ITC cannot be denied solely due to the supplier's default or failure to correctly upload invoices in GSTR-2 without first granting the purchasing dealer an opportunity to establish bona fides through tax invoices and supporting documents. Subject to this interpretative safeguard, challenges to the provision and related CBIC circulars were rejected and the petition was disposed of.
HC upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(aa) of the CGST Act and corresponding State provision, holding that stricter conditions for availing ITC, linked to the supplier's GST compliance, are a legitimate measure to curb fraudulent claims and enhance transparency. However, the provision was read down to protect bona fide recipients: ITC cannot be denied solely due to the supplier's default or failure to correctly upload invoices in GSTR-2 without first granting the purchasing dealer an opportunity to establish bona fides through tax invoices and supporting documents. Subject to this interpretative safeguard, challenges to the provision and related CBIC circulars were rejected and the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.